Predictores sociodemográficos y clínicos de la adherencia a los antidepresivos en los trastornos depresivos: una revisión sistemática con un metanálisis

Ozone Treatment in the Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review of Rationale and Research Directions

Bernardino Clavo, Ángeles Cánovas-Molina, Mario Federico, Gregorio Martínez-Sánchez, Gretel Benítez, Saray Galván, Yolanda Ramallo-Fariña, Himar Fabelo, Sara Cazorla-Rivero, Elba Lago-Moreno, Carla Antonilli, Juan A. Díaz-Garrido, Ignacio J. Jorge, Gustavo Marrero-Callico, Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu, Francisco Rodríguez Esparragón.

SIMPLE SUMARY

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of chemotherapy. CIPN can lead to a dose reduction and/or the interruption of chemotherapy, limiting its effectiveness, while chronic CIPN decreases patients’ quality of life. Unfortunately, the only evidence-based treatment for CIPN-related pain, duloxetine, provides only a modest clinical benefit, and there is no effective clinical management option for numbness and tingling. This narrative review summarizes the mechanisms underlying CIPN and the effects of ozone. It also summarizes experimental studies (18) and clinical reports (27) published between 1995 and 2025 that offer preliminary evidence supporting the potential role of ozone treatment in managing CIPN and highlight the need for ongoing randomized clinical trials to establish its efficacy.

ABSTRACT

Background:

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of chemotherapy. CIPN can lead to a dose reduction and/or the interruption of chemotherapy, limiting its effectiveness, while chronic CIPN decreases patients’ quality of life. Improvements in cancer treatment and patients’ survival have increased the number of patients living with CIPN. The only evidence-based treatment for CIPN-related pain, duloxetine, provides only modest clinical benefit, and there is no effective clinical management option for numbness and tingling. Several experimental studies and clinical reports suggest that adjuvant ozone treatment may be beneficial in managing CIPN.

Methods:

This narrative review aims to provide an overview of current knowledge regarding CIPN and ozone therapy. Specifically, it summarizes experimental studies (18) and clinical reports (27) published between 1995 and 2025 that offer preliminary evidence supporting the potential role of ozone treatment in managing CIPN, highlighting the need for ongoing randomized clinical trials to establish its efficacy. Additionally, this review highlights existing gaps in the literature and proposes directions for future research.

Results:

The hypothesized mechanisms of action and experimental findings suggest that ozone therapy may be a valuable intervention for CIPN, a concept supported by preliminary clinical observations.

Conclusions:

Clinically relevant approaches for established CIPN are currently unavailable. While preliminary data suggest a potential role of ozone therapy, clinical evidence remains limited. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm its efficacy and safety in this context; several trials are currently ongoing.

You can read the full article here.

Predictores sociodemográficos y clínicos de la adherencia a los antidepresivos en los trastornos depresivos: una revisión sistemática con un metanálisis

SESCS PUBLICATION: Health outcomes in caregivers after a continuous group-based educational intervention strategy

María Paula Martín-Andrade, Aroa Camejo-Guerra, Dolores María Ruano-López, Raquel del Rosario Medina-Ponce, Andrea Duarte-Díaz, Beatriz Candela-Angulo, Francisco J. Navarro-Vázquez, Juan José Suárez-Sánchez, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez, Vanesa Ramos-García, Ana Isabel Barreno-Estévez, Yolanda Alvarez-Perez

ABSTRACT

Background:

The increase in life expectancy and chronic diseases has raised the complexity and burden of caring for patients with chronic conditions. This study evaluates a group-based educational intervention aimed at caregivers of these patients, focusing on caregiver burden, mental health, quality of life, and health literacy.

Methods:

A quasi-experimental design with a control group was used. The experimental group participated in a 16-session workshop, while the control group received no intervention. Caregiver burden (Zarit Burden Interview, EZA), mental health (Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scales), quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), family caregiver quality of life (ICUB-97-R), and acquired knowledge were assessed before and after the workshop, as well as at a 3-month follow-up.

Results:

A total of 37 participants (mean age 55.2 years) took part, of whom 35.1% had been caregivers for more than 10 years. Results showed significant improvements in acquired knowledge post-intervention (p = 0.033) in favour of the experimental group. Within-group analyses showed a significant improvement in caregiver impact (ICUB-97-R burden subscale) in the experimental group after the intervention (p = 0.023), while the control group showed a significant worsening in caregiver burden and anxiety. At follow-up, significant improvements in anxiety and depression were observed in the experimental group. Overall, 78% of caregivers rated the workshop sessions positively.

Conclusion:

The group workshop showed beneficial effects on caregivers’ well-being and caregiving capacity. However, strategies are needed to maintain these benefits in the long term.

You can read the full article (in spanish) here.

Predictores sociodemográficos y clínicos de la adherencia a los antidepresivos en los trastornos depresivos: una revisión sistemática con un metanálisis

SESCS PUBLICATION: Pain Relief, Disability, and Hospital Costs After Intradiscal Ozone Treatment or Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A 24-Month Real-World Prospective Study

Sara Bisshopp, Renata Linertová, Miguel A. Caramés, Adam Szolna, Ignacio J. Jorge, Minerva Navarro, Brian Melchiorsen, Benjamín Rodríguez-Díaz, Jesús M. González-Martín, Bernardino Clavo

ABSTRACT

Background/Objectives

Surgery is the treatment of choice for symptomatic disc herniation after unsuccessful conservative management. This prospective study compared the impact on clinical and hospital outcomes of intradiscal ozone treatment vs. surgery (microdiscectomy/discectomy) in our clinical practice.

Methods

Intradiscal ozone treatment was offered to 70 patients with scheduled surgery because of lumbar disc herniation. Initial treatment was surgery in 38 patients and ozone infiltration in 32 patients: lumbar and sciatic pain (Visual Analog Scale), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score, days of hospital admission, and direct hospital costs were recorded during 24 months of follow-up.

Results

At 12 and 24 months, lumbar pain, sciatic pain, and Roland-Morris score decreased significantly within both groups (p < 0.001). At 24 months, compared to the initial surgery, the initial intradiscal ozone treatment showed similar clinical outcomes with significantly lower requirements of surgery (100% versus 47%, p < 0.001) and lower hospital stay [median 2.5 (2–3) versus 0.5 (0–2) days, p < 0.001]. Direct hospital costs were significantly lower with initial ozone treatment at 12 months (p = 0.040).

Conclusions

In our real-world prospective study, after 24 months of follow-up, initial intradiscal ozone treatment avoided surgery in more than half of patients and provided similar clinical outcomes with lower hospitalization requirements. In patients with lumbar disc herniation requiring surgery (microdiscectomy/discectomy), initial intradiscal ozone treatment could offer benefits for patients and healthcare service providers (NCT00566007).

You can read the full article here.

Predictores sociodemográficos y clínicos de la adherencia a los antidepresivos en los trastornos depresivos: una revisión sistemática con un metanálisis

SESCS PUBLICATION: Resource use and healthcare costs in long-term breast cancer survivors (CONCEPT-COSTS)

Cristina Valcárcel Nazco, Benjamín Rodríguez Díaz, David Abbad Gómez, Carmen Guirado Fuentes, Francisco Estupiñán Romero, Enrique Bernal Delgado, María Sala Serra

ABSTRACT

Objective

To analyze the use of resources and healthcare costs of a cohort of long-term survivors of breast cancer in four autonomous communities in Spain (Aragon, Catalonia, Madrid and Navarre) by assessing their pathways in the National Health System.

Method

Patient pathways were analyzed based on their interactions with the National Health System between 2012 and 2016. Healthcare pathways were obtained from the CONCEPT project and were use to examine resource use, associated costs, and to analyze potential differences between cohorts and regions. A total of 18,527 women were included, of whom 6115 were long-term survivors of breast cancer and 12,412 formed the control group, consisting of women with no history of the disease, matched by age and healthcare area with the survivors. Regression models were applied to analyze factors associated with the cost of trajectories.

Results

Long-term survivors of breast cancer had a higher use of healthcare resources, and a higher number of comorbidity and drug use compared to the control group, with statistically significant differences. Costs were also higher for survivors, especially in outpatient clinics. Factors such as the number of drugs, comorbidity and the Charlson index were identified as the main factors associated with higher healthcare costs in both groups.

Conclusions

This study identified the costs of healthcare pathways in long-term breast cancer survivors and suggests that the methodology used could help healthcare professionals allocate resources more efficiently.

You can read the full article (in spanish) here.

Predictores sociodemográficos y clínicos de la adherencia a los antidepresivos en los trastornos depresivos: una revisión sistemática con un metanálisis

SESCS PUBLICATION: Making “inclusion” more than a buzzword: A critical interpretive synthesis of literature about recruiting seldom-heard groups in health research

Meghan Bradway, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez, Alezandra Torres-Castaño, Ana María Claudia Wagner, María Luisa Álvarez-Malé, Garlene Beatriz Zamora Zamorano, Kari Dyb

ABSTRACT

Introducción

Seldom-heard’ groups do not experience equitable access, engagement, or benefits from health services and are often underrepresented in research.

Métodos

This paper presents a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) of the literature. The included articles were those published between 2000 and 2024 in PubMed and Web of Science that focused on the recruitment and engagement of ‘seldom-heard’, ‘hard-to-reach’, or ‘disadvantaged’ groups in Europe. Purposive samples of articles followed a flexible and iterative review. Analysis and synthesis focused on identifying “synthetic constructs” or overarching themes, which informed the development of a “synthesizing argument” regarding recruitment and engagement strategies for seldom-heard groups. The presented paper focuses on the “synthetic constructs”, whereas the “synthetic argument” will be described in a subsequent paper.

Resultados

Of the 7601 articles identified, 23 were included. The analysis revealed four synthetic constructs: 1) the complexity of labels and identity, 2) the impact of labels on recruitment, 3) strategies to address recruitment challenges, and 4) the broader effects of these strategies on research and researchers.

Conclusión

Effective recruitment of seldom heard groups requires lengthy, careful planning, relationship-building, and an understanding of their unique perspectives. In doing so, researchers can contribute to reducing health inequalities and amplifying the voices of underrepresented populations.

Predictores sociodemográficos y clínicos de la adherencia a los antidepresivos en los trastornos depresivos: una revisión sistemática con un metanálisis

SESCS PUBLICATION : Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in diabetes mellitus patients in Spain

Amaia Bilbao-González, Marta González-Sáenz de Tejada, Montse Ferrer, Yolanda Ramallo-Fariña, Miguel Paja-Fano, Carlos García-Forero, Daniela Mestre, Iñigo Gorostiza-Hormaetxe

ABSTRACT

Background

The EQ-5D-5L five-dimensional instrument, is one of the most widely used generic preference-based questionnaires to measure health-related quality of life and to estimate utility indices for use in economic evaluation. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Spanish EQ-5D-5L questionnaire in patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) assessing reliability, validity, and item-level properties such as item functioning.

Methodology

We included 133 patients with DM who completed the EQ-5D-5L, the Audit on Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQoL), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), one question about general health and sociodemographic, and clinical data. The reliability was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha, and the item functioning by the item response theory (IRT). Convergent validity was tested using the Spearman correlation coefficient between EQ-5D-5L, ADDQoL, HADS and the general health question. We examined known-groups validity by comparing the EQ-5D-5L scores between subgroups defined by age, gender, BMI, regular physical activity, disease duration, glycemic control by glycosylated blood hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%), type of DM, general health and anxiety and depression level using t-test, ANOVA, Wilcoxon or Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Results

The reliability was supported with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.78. The IRT results supported the unidimensionality and showed adequate item functioning, except for the anxiety/depression dimension. The item with highest discriminatory power was usual activities dimension, followed by self-care and mobility dimensions. The EQ-5D-5L showed adequate convergent validity, with high correlation with the ADDQoL, HADS and general health. Older age, women, obese, no regular physical activity, ≥ 10 years of disease duration, poor glycemic control, poorer general health and higher anxiety and depression level linked with lower EQ-5D-5L scores.

Conclusions

These findings support the adequate psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with DM, supporting its use for clinicians and researchers as an outcome measure and for use in economic evaluation studies.

You can read the full article here.

Predictores sociodemográficos y clínicos de la adherencia a los antidepresivos en los trastornos depresivos: una revisión sistemática con un metanálisis

SESCS PUBLICATION: Analysis of therapeutic adherence to antidepressants and associated factors in patients with depressive disorder: A population-based cohort study

Diego Infante-Ventura, Benjamín Rodríguez-Díaz, Miguel Ángel García Bello, Cristina Valcárcel-Nazco, Francisco Estupiñán-Romero, Francisco Javier Acosta Artiles, Beatriz González de León, Isabel Hurtado-Navarro, Tasmania del Pino-Sedeño

ABSTRACT

Background

Non-adherence to antidepressants is a common problem that can significantly impact health outcomes in patients with depressive disorders. The aim of this study was to assess antidepressant adherence rates and identify factors associated with non-adherence in a population-based cohort of patients with depressive disorders, using real-world data.

Methods

This retrospective, population-based cohort study used real-world data from patients diagnosed with depression in the Canary Islands, Spain, between 2013 and 2021. Adherence to antidepressants was assessed using the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) over a 12-month follow-up period. Patients were classified as adherent if they had an MPR ≥ 0.8. To assess the association with sociodemographic, clinical, and lifestyle variables, multivariate logistic regression models were performed.

Results

Among the 39,800 patients included, the overall adherence rate to antidepressants was 31.02 %. Older age, female sex, and the presence of multiple comorbidities were significantly associated with higher adherence rates. In contrast, alcohol, and tobacco use, as well as inadequate nutrition, were significantly linked with lower adherence.

Conclusion

Non-adherence to antidepressants is a highly prevalent problem in patients with depressive disorders. The findings of this study highlight the importance of identifying factors that influence adherence and developing specific interventions to improve treatment outcomes in this population.

You can read the full article here.

Predictores sociodemográficos y clínicos de la adherencia a los antidepresivos en los trastornos depresivos: una revisión sistemática con un metanálisis

SESCS PUBLICATION: STRATUM project: AI-based point of care computing for neurosurgical 3D decision support tools

Himar Fabelo, Raquel Leon, Emanuele Torti, Santiago Marco, Asaf Badouh, Max Verbers, Carlos Vega, Javier Santana-Nunez, Yann Falevoz, Yolanda Ramallo-Farina, Christian Weis, Ana M Wagner, Eduardo Juarez, Claudio Rial, Alfonso Lagares, Gustav Burstrom, Francesco Leporati, Luis Jimenez-Roldan, Elisa Marenzi, Teresa Cervero, Miquel Moreto, Giovanni Danese, Svitlana Zinger, Francesca Manni, Maria Luisa Alvarez-Male, Miguel A. García-Bello, Lidia García, Jesus Morera, Juan F. Pineiro, Chrysanthi Bairaktari, Beatriz Noriega-Ortega, Bernardino Clavo, Gustavo M. Callico, STRATUM Consortium

ABSTRACT

Integrated digital diagnostics are transforming complex surgical procedures, with brain tumour surgery being among the most challenging. STRATUM, a five-year Horizon Europe-funded project, aims to develop an advanced 3D decision support system leveraging real-time multimodal data processing powered by artificial intelligence. A key innovation of STRATUM is its design as an energy-efficient Point-of-Care computing system, seamlessly integrated into neurosurgical workflows. This system will provide surgeons with real-time, AI-driven insights, enhancing decision-making accuracy and efficiency. By optimizing surgical precision and reducing procedure duration, STRATUM is expected to improve patient outcomes while streamlining resource utilization within European healthcare systems.

You can read the full article here.

 

 

Predictores sociodemográficos y clínicos de la adherencia a los antidepresivos en los trastornos depresivos: una revisión sistemática con un metanálisis

SESCS PUBLICATION: Exploring digital health tools for depression management in primary health care: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Aïna Fuster-Casanovas, Sonia Moretó Melero, Daniela Cabutto, Carme Carrion, Josep Vidal-Alaball, Estefania Herrera-Ramos, Carles Barcons, Andrea Duarte-Díaz

ABSTRACT

Background

Digital health tools are transforming mental health care, particularly in treating depression, which affects 5 % of the global population and is projected to be the top disease burden by 2030. In primary care, these tools improve accessibility and efficacy, addressing rising mental health demands, especially post-COVID-19.

Objective

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of digital health tools for the management of depression within primary care.

Methods

A systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, focusing on digital health tools for reducing depressive symptoms. Controlled trials were included, with RCTs assessed via the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and non-RCTs evaluated using the JBI checklist for quasi-experimental studies. Depressive symptom reduction was the primary outcome.

Results

A total of 29 controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, identifying were web-based platforms, mobile apps, phone calls, text messages, and decision algorithms. The meta-analysis revealed that digital health tools had a significant effect on depressive symptoms (g = −0.22, 95 % CI: −0.37; −0.06, I2 = 79.64 %). At 6 to 12-month follow-up, the random effects meta-analysis showed that digital health tools had a significant effect on depressive symptoms (g = −0.19, 95%CI: −0.29; −0.09, I2 = 53.42 %).

Conclusions

Digital health tools are effective in reducing the symptoms of repression. Symptom severity does not predict suitability for digital treatment, emphasizing the need for gender-sensitive approaches and strategies for older adults. Integrating digital interventions into clinical guidelines requires studies like this to support their adoption in real-world practice.

You can read the full article here.

Predictores sociodemográficos y clínicos de la adherencia a los antidepresivos en los trastornos depresivos: una revisión sistemática con un metanálisis

SESCS PUBLICATION: Guideline for the economic evaluation of medicines: a proposal by the Spanish National Health System’s Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Financing

Marta Trapero-Bertran, Juan Oliva, Ferrán Catalá-López, Lidia García-Pérez, Lluís Segú, Emilio Jesús Alegre-del-Rey, Ana Clopés, Félix Lobo, Ana Ortega, Jaume Puig-Junoy

ABSTRACT

In 2023, the General Directorate of Pharmacy of the Ministry of Health commissioned the Advisory Committee on the Financing of Pharmaceuticals for the National Health System (CAPF, Comité Asesor para la Financiación de la Prestación Farmacéutica del Sistema Nacional de Salud) to produce a guideline for the evaluation of the efficiency of medicines. The aim of this methodological note is to present their main points. The guideline includes 17 dimensions that an economic evaluation of medicines must encompass, the design of a reference case, and a checklist for evaluating the methodological quality and reporting. This guideline should serve as a foundational document for reforming the health technologies evaluation processes of the Ministry of Health. The guideline can also assist researchers, public health professionals, health technology companies and decision makers in assessing the validity of findings and conclusions from health economic evaluations.

You can read the full article here.